Skip to main content

Table 1 Measurements of representatives of all known species of Mimosphinctes

From: First description of the early Devonian ammonoid Mimosphinctes from Gondwana and stratigraphical implications

Taxon

Number

Locality

dm

dm2

uw

ah

ww

WER

uw/dm

ah/dm

ww/dm

Prim/s

Prim

s

M. bipartitus

33267

Luofu, Guangxi

24

18.09

12.55

5.17

 

1.76

0.52

0.22

 

0.43

10

23

M. bipartitus

33267

Luofu, Guangxi

18.09

12.55

8.677

4.06

 

2.08

0.48

0.22

 

0.58

11

19

M. bipartitus

33267

Luofu, Guangxi

12.55

8.68

6.462

3.51

 

2.1

0.51

0.28

  

10

 

M. cantabricus

HT GPIT Ce 1160/98

Palencia

48.2

38.2

21.5

15.5

10

1.59

0.45

0.32

0.21

0.25

7

28

M. cantabricus

HT GPIT Ce 1160/98

Palencia

23

18

15.6

7.3

5

1.63

0.68

0.32

0.22

   

M. cantabricus

GPIT Ce 1160/616

Palencia

65

52.4

33

19

12.6

1.54

0.51

0.29

0.19

0.25

8

32

M. cantabricus

GPIT Ce 1160/616

Palencia

24.5

20.3

11.5

5.3

4.2

1.46

0.47

0.22

0.17

   

M. cantabricus

GPIT Ce 1160/79

Palencia

27

21.3

13

8.7

5.7

1.61

0.48

0.32

0.21

0.33

10

30

M. cantabricus

GPIT Ce 1160/30

Palencia

47

36.5

23

14.7

10.5

1.66

0.49

0.31

0.22

   

M. discordans

Pl. 11, Figs. 14, 15

Choteč

30

19.8

12.7

10.2

 

2.3

0.42

0.34

0.2

0.25

8

32

M. discordans

Pl. 11, Figs. 14, 15

Choteč

19.8

12.7

8

7.1

 

2.43

0.40

0.36

0.2

0.25

7

28

M. discordans

Pl. 11, Figs. 14, 15

Choteč

12.7

8

5.7

4.7

 

2.52

0.45

0.37

    

M. discordans

Pl. 11, Figs. 14, 15

Choteč

8

5.7

3.9

2.3

 

1.97

0.49

0.29

    

M. discordans

Pl. 27, Fig. 1, NMP-BR 397

Choteč

42

28

19.5

14

 

2.25

0.46

0.33

0.2

0.18

8

45

M. discordans

Pl. 27, Fig. 1, NMP-BR 397

Choteč

28

19.5

13

8.5

 

2.06

0.46

0.30

0.2

0.21

8

38

M. discordans

Pl. 27, Fig. 1, NMP-BR 397

Choteč

19.5

13

10

6.5

 

2.25

0.51

0.33

    

M. discordans

Pl. 27, Fig. 1, NMP-BR 397

Choteč

13

10

7

3

 

1.69

0.54

0.23

    

M. erbeni

3755/11

Uzbekistan

55.5

43.1

28.4

15.7

9.1

1.66

0.51

0.28

0.16

0.27

9

33

M. erbeni

3755/11

Uzbekistan

43.1

30.9

21.6

12.2

7.2

1.95

0.50

0.28

0.17

   

M. erbeni

3755/12

Uzbekistan

50

35.5

25.5

14.5

7.8

1.98

0.51

0.29

0.16

   

M. erbeni

3755/2

Uzbekistan

47.7

32.4

22.3

15.3

 

2.17

0.47

0.32

    

M. erbeni

3755/2

Uzbekistan

40

27.7

19.1

12.3

 

2.09

0.48

0.31

    

M. erbeni

3755/2

Uzbekistan

35.5

24

16.8

11.5

5.4

2.19

0.47

0.32

0.15

0.23

7

31

M. erbeni

3755/10

Uzbekistan

22.8

15.2

10.5

7.6

4.4

2.25

0.46

0.33

0.19

   

M. erbeni

3755/6

Uzbekistan

15.8

10.2

7.5

5.6

3.5

2.4

0.47

0.35

0.22

   

M. erbeni

HT

Uzbekistan

31.8

21.2

15.2

10.6

6.9

2.25

0.48

0.33

0.22

   

M. khanakasuense

Figure 2: 8

Uzbekistan

30

20

13.5

9.6

 

2.25

0.45

0.32

0.2

0.81

17

23

M. rotatile

33277

Luofu, Guangxi

38.8

28.6

19.2

10.2

6.8

1.84

0.49

0.26

0.18

0.2

8

 

M. rotatile

33278

Luofu, Guangxi

55

40

28.2

15

 

1.89

0.51

0.27

  

10

 

M. rotatile

33279

Luofu, Guangxi

24

17

12

7

 

1.99

0.5

0.29

  

9

 

M. rotatile

33280

Luofu, Guangxi

20

14.2

10

5.8

 

1.98

0.5

0.29

  

9

 

M. rudicostatus

3304/301

Uzbekistan

53.2

37

26

16.2

11

2.07

0.49

0.31

0.21

0.2

  

M. rudicostatus

3304/302

Uzbekistan

43

29.4

19.9

13.6

8.4

2.14

0.46

0.32

0.2

0.17

8

47

M. rudicostatus

3304/302

Uzbekistan

33.2

22.9

15.3

10.3

7

2.10

0.46

0.31

0.21

   

M. rudicostatus

HT 3304/160

Uzbekistan

41.5

28.9

19.4

12.6

7.3

2.06

0.47

0.30

0.18

0.15

6

40

M. rudicostatus

3304/303

Uzbekistan

25.1

16.7

11.2

8.4

5.6

2.26

0.45

0.34

0.22

   

M. tenuicostatus

HT 1859/206

N Urals

26

17

11.6

9

5.2

2.34

0.45

0.35

0.2

0.27

8

30

M. tenuicostatus

HT 1859/206

N Urals

17

12

8.8

5

3.4

2.01

0.52

0.29

0.2

0.39

9

23

M. tripartitus

GPIT Ce 1160/50

Palencia

24.5

15.7

11.5

8.8

5

2.44

0.47

0.36

0.20

0.42

8

19

M. tripartitus

GPIBo/Gö 311

Harz

15.7

10.4

7

5.3

 

2.28

0.45

0.34

 

0.4

8

20

M. tripartitus

GPIBo/Gö 311

Harz

23

15.4

10.7

7.6

5.2

2.23

0.47

0.33

0.23

   

M. tripartitus

GPIBo/Gö 311

Harz

33.9

23.1

15.4

10.8

 

2.15

0.45

0.32

    

M. zlichovensis

HT L15453

Zlichov

27

17

12

10

 

2.52

0.44

0.37

 

0.33

8

24

M. zlichovensis

L17709

Zlichov

57

40

29

17

 

2.03

0.51

0.3

    

M. zlichovensis

ICh5422

Zlichov

16

10.2

8

5.8

 

2.46

0.5

0.36

    

M. zlichovensis

ICh5421

Zlichov

12.3

7.5

5.1

4.8

 

2.69

0.411

0.39

    

M. zlichovensis

ICh5406

Zlichov

36

25

16

11

 

2.07

0.44

0.31

    

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

71.75

55.15

38.25

16.6

14.3

1.69

0.53

0.23

0.2

0.29

7

24

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

55.15

38.25

27.75

16.9

10.7

2.08

0.50

0.31

0.19

   

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

38.25

27.75

18.95

10.5

8

1.9

0.5

0.28

0.21

 

10

 

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

27.75

18.95

14.1

8.8

5.3

2.14

0.51

0.32

0.19

 

9

 

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

18.95

14.1

10.05

4.85

3.9

1.81

0.53

0.26

0.21

   

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

14.1

10.05

6.7

4.05

1.6

1.97

0.48

0.29

0.11

   

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

10.05

6.7

6

3.35

1.5

2.25

0.6

0.33

0.15

   

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

6.7

6

4.5

0.7

 

1.25

0.67

0.10

    

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

6

4.5

3.7

1.5

 

1.78

0.62

0.25

    

M. karltschanzi

PIMUZ

Mdouara

4.5

3.7

 

0.8

 

1.48

 

0.18

    
  1. Data from the literature: M. bipartitus—Ruan (1981); M. cantabricus—Kullmann (1960); M. discordans—Barrande (1865) and Erben (1965); M. erbeni—Bogoslovsky (1980); Erbenoceras khanakasuense—Becker et al. 2010; M. rotatile—Ruan (1980); M. rudicostatus—Bogoslovsky (1980); M. tenuicostatus—Bogoslovsky (1969); M. tripartitus—Kullmann (1960) and Göddertz (1989); M. zlichovensis—Göddertz (1989); M. karltschanzi n. sp.—own measurements. Uncertain values and estimates in bold face. For the PCA, only the most complete datasets were used (grey background), sometimes using estimates to complete the set; where possible, the holotype (HT) was included