Skip to main content
Fig. 7 | Swiss Journal of Palaeontology

Fig. 7

From: The nature of the platyceratid–crinoid association as revealed by cross-sectional data from the Carboniferous of Alabama (USA)

Fig. 7

The 95% predictions intervals (PI) for the relationship between the size of an infesting platyceratid and its crinoid host obtained from 1000 simulations of the platyceratid–crinoid association under 3 infestation scenarios: (1) preferential infestation of smaller crinoids (i α 1/crinoid size), 95% PI falls between dotted lines; (2) preferential infestation of larger crinoids (i α crinoid size), 95% PI falls between dashed lines; and (3) random infestation (i independent of crinoid size): 95% PI falls between the solid lines. Observed data from Monteagle Limestone on the relationship between the size of platyceratid and their Dizogocrinus hosts are represented by the solid black squares

Back to article page