Urchins on the edge: an echinoid fauna with a mixed environmental signal from the Eocene of Jamaica
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology volume 134, pages 129–142 (2015)
An echinoid fauna from the Early–Middle Eocene of Jamaica has yielded six species of echinoid: the phymosomatoid Acanthechinus peloria (Arnold and Clark); the oligopygoid Oligopygus sp.; the clypeasteroids Fibularia jacksoni Hawkins and Neolaganum sp.; and the spatangoids Eupatagus alatus Arnold and Clark and Eupatagus sp. cf. E. clevei (Cotteau). Eupatagus alatus has a relatively low test, is broadest posterior of centre, and lacks an anterior sulcus; Eupatagus sp. cf. clevei is relatively higher and more inflated, more parallel-sided, and blunter anteriorly with an anterior sulcus. The discovery of F. jacksoni and Neolaganum sp. together with Oligopygus sp. is unexpected, as these species commonly have different ecological niches in the Eocene of Jamaica. In previous examples described from the Eocene succession of the island, oligopygoids favoured high-energy shelf edge settings, whereas Fibularia and neolaganids prefered low-energy lagoonal settings. The assemblage as a whole likely represents an Early–Mid Eocene echinoid fauna inhabiting a shallow island shelf sea, in a transition between shelf edge and lagoonal setting.
Jamaica boasts a wide variety of fossil echinoids, first described in detail by Hawkins (1923, 1924, 1927, 1930) and Arnold and Clark (1927, 1934). Precise data concerning localities and horizons for most of Arnold and Clark’s species are unknown because of the manner of collection, mostly from road or railway construction workers who were asked about what were locally known as ‘stone sea eggs’ (Arnold and Clark 1927, p. 6). If these labourers were cooperative, Arnold was sold or given some specimens, or collected at the location from where the rocks came. From the associated locality data in Arnold and Clark (1927, 1934), we know that many of the echinoids that they figured and described originated from the Eocene Yellow Limestone Group (Donovan 1988a, 1993).
More recently, the Jamaican Cenozoic echinoid fauna has been found to be particularly diverse, but stratigraphically unevenly known, with an inordinate number of taxa coming from the Eocene (Donovan 1993). During the mid-Early and mid-Middle Eocene, echinoid diversity in the Caribbean was at its height, declining towards the Late Eocene (McKinney et al. 1992; Dixon and Donovan 1994). Subsequent studies of Jamaican fossil echinoids have filled some of these gaps by concentrating on the post-Eocene record (for example, Oligocene—Dixon and Donovan 1998a; Miocene—Donovan et al. 2005; Pliocene—Donovan and Portell 2014; Pleistocene—Donovan 2003).
An undescribed collection of fossil echinoids from the Eocene Guys Hill Formation, Yellow Limestone Group, in Jamaica has yielded species that are otherwise limited to contrasting shallow water palaeoenvironments. Herein, we document this unusual association for the first time and relate it to modern reconstructions of Jamaica’s Eocene palaeogeography.
The terminology of the echinoid endoskeleton used herein follows Melville and Durham (1966), Durham and Wagner (1966), Smith (1984) and Smith and Kroh (2011). The higher classification of echinoids follows Kroh and Smith (2010), apart from the retention of the family Neolaganidae Durham. Our philosophy of open nomenclature follows (1988).
Locality and horizon
The specimens discussed below were collected in 1996–1997 from the east side of a minor road rising to the north above Thornton after the initial hairpin bend, parish of St. Elizabeth, west central Jamaica (Fig. 1). Ms Tricia Andrew, then an undergraduate in the Department of Geography and Geology, University of the West Indies (UWI), Mona, considered the grid reference of this site to be [NGR 3016 4708] on the old 1:50,000 sheet D, “Mandeville–Black River”. This approximates to [NGR 744 714] on Jamaica 1:50,000 (metric edition) sheet #6, “The Cockpit Country” and 77°42′53″W 18°11′33″N.
These rocks form part of the Yellow Limestone Group (mid-Lower to mid-Middle Eocene; Robinson 1994). These oyster-rich beds most probably correspond to “…the higher part of the Guys Hill Formation at the western end of the Central inlier [see Robinson 1994], [where is exposed] an irregularly developed limestone, several metres thick [which] carries an ostreid-rich molluscan fauna and a larger foraminferal fauna…indicative of the lower part of Zone 2A of Robinson [see Robinson and Wright 1993]…[it] is here referred to the Dump Member” (Robinson and Mitchell 1999, p. 6; see also Robinson 1988, p. 60, fig. 13).
This locality includes an oyster bed up to 200 mm thick with shells not preserved in any consistent orientation. Specimens of echinoids were collected from this site by S.K.D. with the help of UWI students Andrew and Deslandes (see Andrew 1997, p. 21; Deslandes 1997, pp. 12–13), Dr. S. F. Mitchell and others.
Remark The specimens discussed below are deposited in the geological collections of the Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (prefix RGM).
Class Echinoidea Leske, 1778
Order Phymosomatoida Mortensen, 1904
Family Phymosomatidae Pomel, 1883
Genus Acanthechinus Duncan and Sladen, 1882
1923 Phymosoma peloria sp. nov., Arnold and Clark, pp. 18–20, pl. 2, figs. 1–3
1988a Phymosoma peloria Arnold and Clark; Donovan, table 1
1988b Phymosoma peloria Arnold and Clark; Donovan, p. 37
1992 Phymosoma; McKinney et al., p. 358, fig. 17.6
1993 Phymosoma peloria Arnold and Clark; Donovan, pp. 379–380, fig. 4.6, 4.11
Material One specimen, RGM 791 235, poorly preserved and moderately weathered; its peristome is covered by matrix, the periproct is visible, interambulcra and ambulacra partially visible and the tubercles are moderately intact.
Remarks There are certain points along the ambitus where the specimen is partly entombed or partially missing plating, making a correct assessment of the outline difficult. The most likely shape is circular. There are two moderately well-preserved interambulacral plates visible, both of which house a large tubercle centrally. There are also some smaller tubercles visible, positioned at the outer end of the plates, with the smallest tubercles towards the lower margin of the plate. Figure 2 shows the pattern of ambulacral plating with diadematoid compounding (Donovan, 1993, p. 379; compare with Smith, 1984, fig. 3.6).
The most probable identity for this specimen is Acanthechinus peloria (Arnold and Clark, 1927). The pore pairs and straight ambulacra are similar, as are the periproct’s size, the low height of the ambitus and the similar ratios of height to diameter. However, RGM 791 235 is smaller than previously described specimens of A. peloria and may be a juvenile; unfortunately, its apical system is not preserved. Another morphologically close species is Upper Eocene Acanthechinus dixie (Cooke, 1941), but Cooke’s species has a more rounded outline, the ambitus is positioned higher on the test and this younger species has not previously been identified from Jamaica.
Cohort Irregularia Latreille, 1825
Order Clypeasteroida L. Agassiz, 1835
Family Oligopygidae Duncan, 1889
Genus Oligopygus de Loriol, 1888
Type species Oligopygus wetherbyi de Loriol, 1888, p. 396, pl. 17, Figs. 7–7d, 8, by original designation (Wagner and Durham 1966, p. U448; Kier 1967, p. 54), from the upper Upper Eocene of the south-east USA (Zachos and Shaak 1978, text-fig. 1; McKinney and Jones 1983).
Oligopygus sp. (Fig. 3)
Material Moderately well-preserved tests include RGM 791 239 (Fig. 3a, b) and 791 241 (Fig. 3c, d), with 46 other specimens, RGM 791 236-791 238, 791 240, 791 242-791 263, 791 264 (20 tests) (Fig. 3e–h). Eighteen specimens with a complete test were used for measurements, to compare with the ratios in Kier (1967), RGM 791 236-791 242, 791 245, 791 248-791 250, 791 253-791 255, 791 258, 791 259, 791 261 and 791 262.
Description. Test elongate/rounded to subpentagonal in larger specimens. Greatest height apically; adoral surface slightly concave with peristome located at the centre of a transverse trough. Apical surface low domed apically, smoothly sloping downwards towards ambitus at about 25 % test height. Apical system central to slightly posterior of centre. Four gonopores set between madreporite and interambulacra (excluding interambulacrum 5), can be either large or small (due to either sexual dimorphism or dissolution of calcite; Kier, 1967, p. 17), with the anterior pair situated closer together than the posterior pair.
Ambulacral petals well developed on apical surface only. Five petals consisting of two columns of pore pairs; outer pores slightly oblique, inner pores circular, petals open. Ambulacra expand adorally to petals, then narrow towards peristome; single pored on oral surface. Anterior petal longest; anterior lateral petals shortest. The interambulacra are widest ambitally, plate sutures smooth. Peristome lensoid, wider than high, anterior steeply slopes inwards and is rounded, posterior is pointed and less sloped. Periproct small, circular and situated midway between peristome and posterior margin; in smaller specimens it is located more posteriorly.
Remarks The master reference for differentiating between the species of oligopygoids is Kier (1967). The lensoid peristome (Fig. 3b, d–h) is characteristic of Oligopygus. There is an overlap in gross morphology among some species within Oligopygus (as well as the closely related Haimea; see Rowe, 2004), most relevantly between Oligopygus curavasica Molengraaff, 1929 , O. haldemani Conrad, 1850, O. jamaicensis Arnold and Clark, 1927, and O. wetherbyi de Loriol, 1888. The main differences between these species are the relative positions and shapes of the periproct. It is situated most posteriorly in O. haldemani, almost against the ambitus. In O. wetherbyi the periproct is located halfway between the posterior ambitus and the peristome, whereas in O. curavasica it falls between these two with the periproct situated 60–70 % of the distance from the peristome to the ambitus. In O. jamaicensis the peristome is central, but shaped as a narrow slit. The similarities in gross morphology of O. curavasica to O. wetherbyi fossils raise the question whether or not they are actually different species, ecophenotypes or synonyms. Oligopygus curavasica has not been recorded from the type area, the Eocene in Curaçao, since it was described by Molengraaff (1929), although this may merely be a reflection of the lack of more recent research on the Eocene of the Netherlands Antilles.
Most specimens in the present collection are weathered quite severely, making it difficult to distinguish any tuberculation, but emphasizing the patterns of test plating (Fig. 3a–d). All of the measured specimens have ratios that closely match those of Kier (1967) for O. wetherbyi, with an average width to length percentage of 89 % and an average height to length percentage of 47 %, but the type species is a somewhat younger taxon than that considered herein. In Jamaica, O. wetherbyi has only been reported, most probably erroneously, from the upper-Middle Eocene Swanswick Formation, White Limestone Group (Donovan 1993, p. 384; 1994, table 1). Because of the inferior preservation of the Thornton material, we leave it in open nomenclature; it may be closest to O. jamaicensis Arnold and Clark, 1927, which has broadly similar gross test dimensions to O. wetherbyi, but is more rounded. However, because of the poor preservation of these specimens, the outline of the peristome is poorly seen (Fig. 3b, d, e–h) and some appear closer to Haimea than Oligopygus (Fig. 3d). Herein, we consider this difference taphonomic—test plates of oligopygoids are thick and surface corrosion common (Fig. 3), altering the outline of the peristome—rather than systematic.
Family Fibulariidae Gray, 1855
Genus Fibularia Lamarck, 1816
Type species Fibularia ovulum Lamarck, 1816, p. 16, by the subsequent designation of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1954, p. 350) (Durham, 1966, p. U469; Smith and Kroh, 2011), from the Recent of the East Indies.
Material Complete, but weathered, specimens, RGM 791 265-791 281, 791 282 (eight tests), 791 283-791 285, 791 286 (two tests), 791 287 (two tests) (32 specimens). RGM 791 285 and 791 287 also bear tests of Neolaganum durhami (see below). Specimens with a complete test were used for measurements and for comparison with the original description in Hawkins (1927).
Measurements Length 5.3–8.2 mm (mean 7.1 mm); height 3.4–7.2 mm (mean 5.4 mm); height to length ratio 0.6–0.8 (mean 0.75); distance between peristome and periproct 0.9–1.2 mm (mean 1.0 mm); ratio peristome-periproct distance to length 0.14–0.17 (mean 0.15). No complete petals available for measurement.
Remarks Although a moderately large collection of Fibularia jacksoni Hawkins, 1927, was available, none of the specimens are complete (Fig. 4a, b). Commonly, either the oral or apical surface is damaged or the specimen is partially entombed in limestone, preventing measurements. None of the specimens exhibited easily distinguishable apical systems and only one or two petals are partially visible, preventing measurements of petal length and plating. Genital pores were similarly difficult to distinguish. Five specimens with an intact oral surface allowed measurements of the distance between the peristome and periproct.
The 11 specimens measured by Arnold and Clark (1927, p. 28) and Hawkins (1927, p. 76) have similar dimensions to specimens in the present collection. The specimens measured by Arnold and Clark are slightly larger on the whole than the present sample, varying from 8.5 to 10.0 mm in length (mean 9.5 mm) and a height of 5.75–7.0 mm (mean 6.25 mm), giving a ratio of 0.6–0.7 height to length.
Family Neolaganidae Durham, 1954
Genus Neolaganum Durham, 1954
Type species Laganum archerensis Twitchell in Clark and Twitchell, 1915, pp. 161–162, pl. 75, figs. 1a–d, by original designation (Durham, 1954, p. 680, 1966, p. U475) from the Upper Eocene of the south-east USA (Smith and Kroh 2011).
Neolaganum sp. (Fig. 4c–e)
Material This description is based on one complete, but severely weathered specimen, RGM 791 288, part of a collection of 11 specimens, RGM 791 285 (with F. jacksoni), 791 287 (with F. jacksoni), 791 289-791 296.
Description Test ovate to subpentagonal in shape and very low. Size small to medium, length varying from 6.3 to 15.3 mm (mean 10.1 mm) and width 5.8 to 13.3 mm (mean 8.7 mm), giving a width to length ratio of 0.74–0.9 (mean 0.85). The height varies from 1.5 to 2.2 mm (mean 1.5 mm) giving a height to length ratio between 0.14 and 0.24 (mean 0.16).
Apical system slightly anterior to centre, raised, petals flush with surface; madreporite and genital pores not visible on any specimens. Upper surface of test slightly depressed into margin at end of petals. Petals closed, petal pore pairs not conjugate; petals extend halfway to ambitus from the centre of apical system.
Adoral surface flattened. Peristome slightly anterior, periproct small, rounded, located very close to posterior ambitus.
Remarks Of the 11 specimens, 3 are free of the limestone. Other specimens are partially entombed, with only the adoral surface visible. All specimens are severely weathered, but general outlines can be made out including the positions of the peristome and periproct. One specimen, RGM 791 288 (Fig. 4c, d), has partially visible petals, allowing the non-conjugate pore pairs and closed petals to be distinguished. The subpentagonal outline of all the specimens is characteristic of neolaganids. The plating of the oral surfaces of RGM 791 285 and 791 292 are directly comparable to that of the type species (Durham 1954, fig. 2b; Fig. 4e herein).
The specimens from the Guys Hill Formation most closely resemble Upper Eocene Neolaganum durhami Cooke, 1959, from the south-east USA. The open petals and depressed apical surface with a slightly inflated margin are features typical of neolaganids. The specimens are also comparable to, but more ovate than, the similar Cubanaster Sánchez Roig, 1949. In Neolaganum, the slightly inflated margin and a raised apical system, which, in turn, is situated in a shallow depression on the aboral surface, is less eccentric in comparison to Cubanaster, which has a deeper depression giving the margin a more inflated appearance. Additionally, the specimens described herein have some minor grooves on the oral surface leading to the peristome, a further characteristic of neolaganids (Durham 1955). Dixon and Donovan (1998b) briefly reviewed new records of neolaganids from the Eocene of Jamaica without adding any Neolaganum species.
Order Spatangoida L. Agassiz, 1840
Family Brissidae Gray, 1855
Genus Eupatagus L. Agassiz, 1847
Synonymy See Kier (1984, p. 95).
Material RGM 791 297 (Fig. 5), 13 further tests all moderately well preserved, RGM 791 298-791 310, and 32 poorly preserved or broken tests, RGM 791 311. Even the best-preserved tests do not retain details of the fascioles.
Description (See also Arnold and Clark 1927, pp. 63, 64, pl. 13, figs. 4–7; Kier 1984, pp. 95–98, text-fig. 34, pl. 54, pl. 55, figs. 1, 2; Donovan 1993, pp. 401, 402, fig. 17.3, 17.4.) Eupatagus with a relatively low test; its broadest point posterior of centre; and with petals II and IV extending towards the anterior ambitus, but terminating before reaching it. Test moderately large, rounded oval in outline, blunt at centre of anterior, length about 44–57 mm (mean 51 mm); width 74–84 % of length (mean 81 %) (Fig. 5a, b). Greatest width slightly posterior to apical system; height 33–37 % of length (mean 35 %); greatest height posteriorly, at anal cone. Apical system anterior; distance from anterior margin to centre of apical system 37–43 % length (mean 41 %); four genital pores, apical system ethmolytic with genital plate 2 separating posterior ocular plates. Anterior ambulacrum III not petaloid, pores small, non-conjugate anisopores, flush with test. Anterior petals (II and IV) moderately long, closing, almost extending to margin, angled towards anterior, petal length 29–38 % of length (mean 34 %). Interporiferous zones wide, tapering towards ends, feather-shaped, poriferous zone narrow. Posterior petals (V and I) long, 36–44 % length (mean 41 %), extending towards anal cone, petals closing distally. RGM 791 297 is 56 mm long, with 62 pore pairs in petal I; RGM 791 301 is 52 mm long, with 58 pore pairs in petal I. Interporiferous zones of petals I, II, IV and V slightly raised; pores strongly conjugate with furrow; inner pore circular, outer pore more oblique.
Peristome anterior of centre, distance from edge of anterior margin to anterior edge of peristome 27–30 % of length (mean 28 %). Periproct situated high on posterior truncation; opening higher than wide, not visible from above. Primary tubercles large apically, slightly smaller orally. RGM 791 297 with largest tubercles 1 mm in diameter, irregularly arranged among interambulacra on aboral surface; this same specimen has a fragment of the peripetalous fasciole visible, next to petal IV. Labrum long, narrow, extending posteriorly, approximately two-thirds past the fourth adjacent ambulacral plate. Plastron composed of four plates, two sternal and two smaller, post-sternal plates.
Remarks Previous reports of Eupatagus alatus have described an echinoid similar in size to the Thornton specimens, with a mean test length of 56 mm and a similar width, mean 83 % of length (Kier 1984). However, the broadest point of the test of the Thornton specimens is situated slightly posterior to the centre of the apical system, whereas in E. alatus the broadest point is central (Kier 1984). The apical systems resemble each other superficially; however, there are some further differences. The centre of the apical system is located more anteriorly in E. alatus with a mean 28 % of length to the anterior margin; in the Thornton specimens this is a mean 41 % of length. The anterior petals, II and IV, have similar dimensions, a mean 34 % of length in E. alatus and 32 % of length in the Thornton specimens. However, in E. alatus the petals stretch towards the dorsal ambitus at roughly 90° from ambulacrum III; in the Thornton specimens, petals II and IV are angled more towards the anterior ambitus and terminate before reaching it, making them appear shorter. The main difference between E. alatus and specimens from Thornton was found to be the variation of their height to length ratios. Eupatagus alatus has a mean height to length ratio of 51 % (Kier 1984), but in the Thornton specimens the mean is 35 %, a large difference. The extension of the labrum differs, too; it extends to the middle of the third adjacent ambulacral plate in E. alatus, whereas in Thornton the labrum extends to two-thirds of the fourth adjacent ambulacral plate. However, despite all of these variances, the Thornton specimens are undoubtedly close to E. alatus, which has demonstrated a broad range of morphological variations, and are included therein with confidence.
Another similar Antillean taxon to Thornton E. alatus is Eupatagus clevei Cotteau, 1875, also described in Kier (1984). Eupatagus clevei, however, has a high test, albeit similar to that of E. alatus, at about 51 % of length. Eupatagus antillarum Cotteau, 1875, is similarly not conspecific with the Thornton specimens as its test is too high and its highest point is at the apical system, not posterior at the anal cone.
Eupatagus from the Middle Eocene of the southeastern USA includes E. carolinensis Clark in Clark and Twitchell, 1915, E. wilsoni Kier, 1980, E. lawsonae Kier, 1980, and E. texanus Zachos in Zachos and Molineux, 2003. Eupatagus carolinensis has shorter ambulacral petals and a significantly higher test, high and sloping anteriorly (Clark and Twitchell 1915, pp. 153, 154, pl. 71, figs. 3a–d, 4; Kier 1980, pp. 50, 51, fig. 24, pl. 20, figs. 1–6). Eupatagus wilsoni is also higher than the Thornton species, rounded in lateral view both anteriorly and posteriorly, and broad at about mid-length (Kier 1980, pp. 51–53, pl. 20, figs. 7–11). Eupatagus lawsonae is well rounded proximally, strongly tapered distally, a bun-like profile and relatively narrower ambulacral petals than the Thornton tests (Kier 1980, p. 53, pl. 21, figs. 1–4). Eupatagus texanus is diagnosed by Zachos (in Zachos and Molineux 2003, p. 504) as being large and fragile with widely divergent anterior petals; it also has long petals which do not close distally and is well rounded anteriorly. None of these is close to E. alatus from Thornton.
Similar and congeneric species to the Thornton tests were figured in Smith and Kroh (2011), including E. rajasthanensis Srivastava and Singh, 2008, and E. rostratus Archiac and Haime, 1853. The main difference between E. rajasthanensis and Thornton E. alatus is the sunken ambulacrum III which forms a shallow groove and its more raised test. Eupatagus rostratus has a very similar lateral view (test is low and flat dorsally) and its ambulacrum III is flush with the surface of the test; however, its tuberculation is very different (much larger and less). Eupatagus rajasthanensis and E. rostratus both come from the Eocene of India (Smith and Kroh 2011).
Material An incomplete specimen, RGM 791 312.
Description Test large, oval, broad and rounded, rectangular anteriorly with the anterior ambulacrum slightly infolded at the ambitus; more pointed posteriorly. Length is 95.1 mm; widest centrally, 79.8 mm; height, though incomplete, at periproct, 36.7 mm, which is situated posteriorly forming an anal cone. Ratios: height to length, 0.39; height to width, 0.84. Petals particularly broad. Petals IV and V partially visible; ambulcra III non-petaloid and forms a shallow groove, making the anterior ambitus slightly lobed. Petals IV and V closed, pore pairs conjugate, connected by shallow furrow, both inner and outer pores circular. Periproct posterior, higher than wide, teardrop-shaped, albeit poorly preserved. Peristome positioned anteriorly, wider than high; anterior edge of peristome approximately 21 mm from anterior ambitus. Sub-apical tubercles small, irregularly arranged among interambulacra. No fascioles preserved.
Remarks This test is unusually large for this collection with a gross morphology that distinguishes it from E. alatus (compare Figs. 5, 6). It is lacking the complete apical system and much of the surrounding apical surface (Fig. 6a); however, measurements of gross dimensions were made and its oral surface is fairly well preserved. There is also a difference in the height to length ratio, where E. alatus has a mean ratio of 0.35 with a highest ratio of 0.37; RGM 791 312 reaches 0.39, a higher ratio. Furthermore, this Eupatagus has a more raised test overall, whereas in E. alatus from Thornton the tests are more wedge-shaped, with a very low anterior, making the lateral profile different.
There are some other likely candidates for close relationship with this specimen. The Cuban Zanolettiaster herrarae Sánchez Roig, 1952, probably a junior synonym of Eupatagus clevei (Cotteau, 1875) (Kier 1984, p. 98), is similar. Both species are approximately 100 mm long, have closed petals, a similar general outline with anterior lobes and a more pointed posterior. Furthermore, they are similar in lateral profile. Both specimens lack complete apical systems, but the partially visible petals do differ, extending to the ambitus in Z. herrarae, much further than in this Thornton E. alatus. The condition of the tests makes further comparison difficult and an oral view of Z. herrarae has not been figured (Sánchez Roig 1952, pl. 8; Kier 1984, pl. 61, figs. 5, 6). Eupatagus clevei Cotteau, 1875, is closest in gross morphology, with similar dimensions, to RGM 791 312.
The Eocene echinoid fauna of Jamaica is particularly diverse (Donovan 2001). Echinoid diversity declined from the Late Eocene onwards (Fig. 7) and fewer tests are found in younger strata. This is most probably a reflection, in part, of a preservation bias in the White Limestone Group (Middle Eocene to Middle Miocene) and related collection failure from these more well-lithified limestones (Donovan 2004).
Throughout the Paleocene and Eocene the climate was warm, with tropical temperatures extending into what is now Canada. The Paleocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) has been attributed to various large-scale geological events, including volcanism, continental drift, orbital forcing (Prothero 1994) and, more recently, a Paleocene/Eocene impact event which led to a hypothesized ‘Bolide summer’, an extended period of warm temperatures (Cramer and Kent 2005). The sustained period of warm climate lasted well into the Eocene, and it was during this time that echinoid diversity in Jamaica and the wider Antilles reached its peak (Donovan 2001; Fig. 7 herein). Although there are various theories as to what caused the Late Eocene extinctions, they are commonly attributed to climatic changes; by the end of the Eocene the first Antarctic ice sheets had formed, lowering sea levels and changing weather patterns and ocean currents (McKinney and Oyen 1989; Prothero 1994; Budd 2000). Because Jamaica is located in the humid tropics, one might not expect large biotic fluctuations in response to variations in climatic conditions, as temperatures do not fluctuate much at this latitude. However, a decline in echinoid diversity by the Oligocene is apparent (Dixon and Donovan 1994, 1998a), likely reflecting changes in currents and primary production; many echinoid genera and species from the Eocene were extinct by the Oligocene, replaced by taxa analogous to modern faunas by the Pleistocene (Donovan 1993, 2001; Donovan et al. 2007).
In the assemblage of Eocene echinoids from Thornton, the most common taxon is the spatangoid E. alatus, with a total of 46 tests and test fragments, followed by Fibularia jacksoni (32 tests and fragments) and Oligopygus sp. (48 tests and fragments). Other species include Neolaganum sp. (eleven tests), a single Eupatagus sp. cf. E. clevei and one regular echinoid, Acanthechinus peloria. The large number of irregular echinoids in this collection likely reflects a bias in preservation potential, due to life mode and morphology (Kier 1977; Smith 1984). The most notable absences are the large spines of cidaroids that form a conspicuous part of many Cenozoic assemblages in Jamaica (Donovan 1993). These are commonly the most prominent evidence of the presence of regular echinoids in an assemblage. We must conclude that they were truly absent from this fauna.
When comparing the present collection to known stratigraphic and palaeogeographic distributions of fossil echinoids from the Eocene of Jamaica, some interesting anomalies are apparent. In Jamaica, an Oligopygus close to Oligopygus wetherbyi de Loriol, 1888, was previously only known from the White Limestone Group, Swanswick Formation (Donovan 1993 p. 384). The Swanswick Formation was deposited in a high-energy shelf edge environment (Donovan 1993, 2004). Oligopygus sp. from the present collection shows morphological differences to known tests from the Late Eocene of Curaçao. It is possible that these Oligopygus tests represent an intermediate step in oligopygoid morphology between Oligopygus jamaicensis Arnold and Clark, 1927, and O. wetherbyi, as the current specimens exhibit characteristics attributable to both species. Additionally, Oligopygus jamaicensis is known from the Early to Middle Eocene, similar to the Oligopygus fossils in the present collection.
Fibularia jacksoni and the neolaganids are known from the Troy Formation, deposited in a low-energy lagoon setting and ranging from mid-Middle to Late Eocene strata (Mitchell 2004, fig. 8; Donovan 2004, table 1). Neolaganum sp. has not been previously recorded from the Eocene of Jamaica and is otherwise known from the Eocene of southeastern North America. General life modes of neolaganids are similar, thus the palaeoenvironmental signals they present are similar (low-energy lagoon setting). Oligopygoids do not commonly occur in association with Fibularia or neolaganids in Jamaican Eocene strata, although this distinction is not so marked elsewhere. Oligopygoids typically inhabit high-energy shelf edge settings, whereas Fibularia and neolaganids inhabit low-energy lagoonal settings. Curiously, in this collection Fibularia, neolaganids and oligopygoids occur in association together, possibly suggesting an extended habitat range for oligopygoids during the Early to Middle Eocene or, more probably, this locality represents an intermediate environment in which all three species flourished.
The common occurrence of E. alatus and Oligopygus sp. at this locality indicate a high-energy shelf edge setting (Donovan 1994); these taxa were locally common occurrence in the mid-Early to mid-Middle Eocene of Jamaica. If the presence of Fibularia and neolaganids in this assemblage cannot be attributed to postmortem transportation, perhaps these taxa, too, were more ubiquitous than previously thought.
Miller and Donovan (1996; see also Donovan et al. 2007) examined the palaeoenvironmental distribution of echinoids in the Yellow Limestone group of Jamaica (Fig. 8). Oligopygoids mainly occurred in shelf edge environments (also true in Georgia, but not Florida; B. D. Carter, written communication); clypeasteroids, namely neolaganids and F. jacksoni, were commonest in lower energy `lagoonal’ environments; and spatangoids and most cassiduloids were better represented in shelf edge environments. Thornton is the first site in Jamaica from which oligopygoids have been found in association with neolaganids and F. jacksoni. Localities with the former association are considered to be shelf edge, while the latter are `lagoonal’. Interestingly, Thornton plots close to the boundary between these palaeoenvironments (Fig. 8), perhaps suggesting that it represents a transition zone between them.
In conclusion, this assemblage contains six echinoid species. The association of F. jacksoni and Neolaganum sp. with Oligopygus sp. has not been previously recorded from the Jamaican Eocene. This association is interesting because oligopygoids are considered to have preferred high-energy shelf edge settings, in contrast to Fibularia and neolaganids, which preferred low-energy lagoonal settings. This suggests a transitional setting for this locality, between shelf edge and lagoon. Of two species of Eupatagus, most are assigned to E. alatus, a common Eocene taxon in the tropical western Atlantic.
Agassiz, L. (1835). Prodrome d’une monographie des radiares ou echinoderms. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de Neuchâtel, 1, 168–199.
Agassiz, L. (1840). Catalogus systematicus Ectyporum Echinodermatum fossilium Musei Neocomiensis, secundum ordinem zoologicum dispositus; adjacetis synonymis recentioribus, nec non stratis et locis in quibus reperiuntur. Sequuntur characteres diagnostici generum novorum vel minus cognitorum. Neuchâtel, Petitpierre.
Agassiz, L. (1847). Catalogue raisonée des éspèces, des genres et des familles d’echinides, pt. 2. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie, Paris (série 3), 7, 129–168.
Andrew, T. (1997). A geological report on fieldwork done in the Aberdeen–Pullet Hall area St. Elizabeth. Unpublished B.Sc. thesis, Department of Geography and Geology, University of the West Indies, Mona.
Archiac, E. J. A. D. d’., & Haime, J. (1853). Description des animaux fossils du groupe nummulitique de l’Inde: les echinoderms. Paris.
Arnold, B. W., & Clark, H. L. (1927). Jamaican fossil echini. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard, 50, 1–75.
Arnold, B. W., & Clark, H. L. (1934). Some additional fossil echini from Jamaica. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard, 54, 139–156.
Bengtson, P. (1988). Open nomenclature. Palaeontology, 31, 223–227.
Budd, A. F. (2000). Diversity and extinction in the Cenozoic history of Caribbean reefs. Coral Reefs, 19, 25–35.
Clark, W. B., and Twitchell, M. W. (1915). The Mesozoic and Cenozoic Echinodermata of the United States. US Geological Survey Monograph, 54, 341.
Conrad, T. A. (1850). Descriptions of one new Cretaceous and seven new Eocene fossils. Journal Academique des Sciences Naturelles. Philadelphia (series 2), 2, 39–41.
Cooke, C. W. (1941). Cenozoic regular echinoids of eastern United States. Journal of Palaeontology, 15, 1–20.
Cooke, C. W. (1959). Cenozoic echinoids of eastern United States. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper, 321, 106.
Cotteau, G. H. (1875). Description des échinides tertiares des îles St. Barthélemy et Anguilla. Kunliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 13(6), 1–48.
Cramer, B. S., & Kent, V. D. (2005). Bolide summer: the Paleocene/Eocene thermal maximum as a response to an extraterrestrial trigger. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 224, 144–166.
Deslandes, E. (1997). Report of the geological mapping of the Maggoty area–northern (sic) St. Elizabeth. Unpublished B.Sc. thesis, Department of Geography and Geology, University of the West Indies, Mona.
Dixon, H. L., & Donovan, S. K. (1994). Local extinction patterns and the decline of the Jamaican Paleogene echinoid fauna. Palaios, 9, 506–511.
Dixon, H. L., & Donovan, S. K. (1998a). Oligocene echinoids of Jamaica. Tertiary Research, 18, 95–124.
Dixon, H. L., & Donovan, S. K. (1998b). The occurrence and distribution of neolaganid clypeasteroid echinoids in Jamaica. Contributions to Geology, UWI, Mona, 3, 77.
Donovan, S. K. (1988a). A preliminary biostratigraphy of the Jamaican fossil Echinoidea. In R. D. Burke, P. V. Mladenov, P. Lambert, & R. L. Parsley (Eds.), Echinoderm Biology: Proceedings of the Sixth International Echinoderm Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, 23–28 August, 1987 (pp. 125–131). Rotterdam: Balkema.
Donovan, S. K. (1988b). A second B.W. Arnold collection of Jamaican fossil echinoids. Journal of the Geological Society of Jamaica, 24 (for 1987), 36–43. [Erratum. 1989. Journal of the Geological Society of Jamaica, 25 (for 1988), 49.].
Donovan, S. K. (1993). Jamaican Cenozoic Echinoidea. In Wright, R. M., & Robinson, E. (Eds), Biostratigraphy of Jamaica. Geological Society of America Memoir, 182, 371–412.
Donovan, S. K. (1994). Middle and Upper Eocene echinoids of Jamaica. In B. David, A. Guille, J. P. Firal, & M. Roux (Eds.), Echinoderms through Time: Proceedings of the Eighth International Echinoderm Conference, Dijon, 6–10th September, 1993 (pp. 629–635). Rotterdam: Balkema.
Donovan, S. K. (2001). Evolution of Caribbean echinoderms during the Cenozoic: moving towards a complete picture using all the fossils. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 166, 177–192.
Donovan, S. K. (2003). Completeness of a fossil record: the Pleistocene echinoids of the Antilles. Lethaia, 36, 1–7.
Donovan, S. K. (2004). Echinoderms of the Mid-Cainozoic White Limestone Group of Jamaica. In Donovan, S. K. (Ed.), The Mid-Cainozoic White Limestone Group of Jamaica. Cainozoic Research, 3, 143–156.
Donovan, S. K., and Portell, R. W. (2014). Fossil echinoids from the Upper Pliocene Hopegate Formation of north central Jamaica. Caribbean Journal of Science, 47 (for 2013), p 15.
Donovan, S. K., Portell, R. W., & Domning, D. P. (2007). Contrasting patterns and mechanisms of extinction during the Eocene-Oligocene transition in Jamaica. In W. Renema (Ed.), Biogeography, Time, and Place: Distributions, Barriers and Islands (pp. 247–273). Dordrecht: Springer.
Donovan, S. K., Portell, R. W., & Veltkamp, C. J. (2005). Lower Miocene echinoderms of Jamaica, West Indies. Scripta Geologica, 129, 91–135.
Duncan, P. M. (1889). A revision of the genera and great groups of the Echinoidea. Journal of the Linnean Society, Zoology, 23, 1–311.
Duncan, P. M., and Sladen, W. P. (1882). Tertiary and Upper Cretaceous fossils from Western Sind: the fossil Echinoidea. No. 2. The fossil Echinoidea from the Ranikot Series [of nummulitic strata] in western Sind. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica (series 14), 1 (3), 21–100.
Durham, J. W. (1954). A new family of clypeasteroid echinoids. Journal of Paleontology, 28, 677–684.
Durham, J. W. (1955). Classification of clypeasteroid echinoids. University of California Publications in Geological Science, 31, 73–198.
Durham, J. W. (1966). Clypeasteroids. In R. C. Moore (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U, Echinodermata 3(2) (pp. U450–U491). Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.
Durham, J. W., & Wagner, C. D. (1966). Glossary of morphological terms applied to echinoids. In R. C. Moore (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U, Echinodermata 3(2) (pp. U253–U256). Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.
Fischer, A. G. (1966). Spatangoids. In R. C. Moore (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U, Echinodermata 3(2) (pp. U543–U628). Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.
Gray, J. E. (1855). Catalogue of the Recent Echinida or Sea-Eggs in the British Museum, Part I. London: Echinida Irregularia.
Hawkins, H. L. (1923). Some Cretaceous Echinoidea from Jamaica. Geological Magazine, 60, 199–216.
Hawkins, H. L. (1924). Notes on a new collection of fossil Echinoidea from Jamaica. Geological Magazine, 61, 312–324.
Hawkins, H. L. (1927). Descriptions of new species of Cainozoic Echinoidea from Jamaica. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology Harvard, 50, 76–84.
Hawkins, H. L. (1930). (Pp. 215-216). In Trechmann, C. T., The Manchioneal Beds of Jamaica. Geological Magazine, 78, 199–218.
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (1954). Opinion 207. Designation, under the Plenary Powers, of the type species in harmony with accustomed use for the genera Echinocyamus van Phelsum, 1774, and Fibularia Lamarck, 1816 (Class Echinoidea). Opinions and Declarations rendered by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 3, 339–352.
Kier, P. M. (1967). Revision of the oligopygoid echinoids. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 152(2), 1–149.
Kier, P. M. (1977). The poor fossil record of the regular echinoid. Palaeobiology, 3, 168–174.
Kier, P. M. (1980). The echinoids of the Middle Eocene Warley Hill Formation, Santee Limestone, and Castle Hayne Formation of North and South Carolina. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 39, iv + 102 pp.
Kier, P. M. (1984). Fossil spatangoid echinoids of Cuba. Smithsonian Contributions to Palaeobiology, 55, 1–336.
Kroh, A., & Smith, A. B. (2010). The phylogeny and classification of post-Palaeozoic echinoids. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 8, 147–212.
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M. de. (1816). Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres, présentant les caractères, généralaux et particuliers de ces animaux, leurs distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres et la citation synonymique des principales espèces qui s’y rapportent. First edition, Volume 3. Paris.
Latreille, P. A. (1825). Familles naturelles du régne animal. Paris: Baillière.
Leske, N. G. (1778). Iacobi Theodori Klein Naturalis disposito echinodermatum…, edita et descriptionibus novisque inventis et synonomis auctorem aucta. Leipzig.
Loriol, P. de. (1888). Notes pour servir a l’étude des echinoderms. Recueil Zoologique Suisse, Geneve (série 1), 4, 365–407.
McKinney, M. L., & Jones, D. S. (1983). Oligopygoid echinoids and the biostratigraphy of the Ocala Limestone of peninsular Florida. Southeastern Geology, 24, 21–30.
McKinney, M. L., McNamara, K. J., Carter, B. D., & Donovan, S. K. (1992). Evolution of Paleogene echinoids: a global and regional view. In D. R. Prothero & W. A. Berggren (Eds.), Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution (pp. 349–367). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
McKinney, M. L., & Oyen, C. W. (1989). Causation and nonrandomness in biological and geological time series: temperature as a proximal control of extinction and diversity. Palaios, 4, 3–15.
Melville, R. V., & Durham, J. W. (1966). Skeletal morphology. In R. C. Moore (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U, Echinodermata 3(1) (pp. U220–U251). Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.
Miller, D. J., Donovan, S. K. (1996). Geomorphology, stratigraphy and palaeontology of Wait–a–Bit Cave, central Jamaica. Tertiary Research, 17(for 1995), 33–49.
Mitchell, S. F. (2004). Lithostratigraphy and palaeogeography of the White Limestone Group. In Donovan, S. K. (Ed.), The Mid-Cainozoic White Limestone Group of Jamaica. Cainozoic Research, 3 (for 2003), 5–29.
Molengraaff, G. J. H. (1929). Beschrijving van de echiniden uit het Boven-Eoceen van Curaçao. In Geologie en Geohydrologie van het Eiland Curaçao (pp. 72–83). Delft.
Mortensen, T. (1904). The Danish Expedition to Siam 1899-1900. III. Echinoidea (1). Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter (series 7), 1 (1), 1–124.
Pomel, N. A. (1883). Classification méthodique et genera des échinides vivants et fossils. Alger: Adolphe Jourdan.
Prothero, D. R. (1994). The Eocene-Oligocene Transition: Paradise Lost. New York: Columbia University Press.
Robinson, E. (1988). Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary sedimentary rocks of the Central Inlier, Jamaica. Journal of the Geological Society of Jamaica, 24 (for 1987), 49–67.
Robinson, E. (1994). Jamaica. In S. K. Donovan & T. A. Jackson (Eds.), Caribbean Geology: An introduction (pp. 111–127). Mona: University of the West Indies Publishers’ Association.
Robinson, E., & Mitchell, S. F. (1999). Middle Eocene to Oligocene stratigraphy and palaeogeography in Jamaica: a window on the Nicaragua Rise. Contributions to Geology UWI Mona, 4, 1–47.
Robinson, E., and Wright, R. M. (1993). Jamaican Paleogene larger foraminifera. In Wright, R. M., Robinson, E. (Eds), Biostratigraphy of Jamaica. Geological Society of America Memoir, 182, 283–345.
Rowe, D. A. C. (2004). Eocene Echinoids of Beecher Town, Swanswick Formation, St. Ann, Jamaica. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of the West Indies, Mona.
Sánchez Roig, M. (1949). Los equinodermos fosiles de Cuba. Paleontologia Cubana, 1, 1–330.
Sánchez Roig, M. (1952). Nuevos generous y species de equinodermos fosiles Cubanos. Memorias de la Sociedad Cubana de Historia Natural “Felipe Poey”, 21, 1–30.
Smith, A. B. (1984). Echinoid Palaeobiology. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Smith, A. B., and Kroh, A. (Eds). (2011). The Echinoid Directory. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/projects/echinoid-directory [Accessed January 2014].
Srivastava, D. K., & Singh, H. (2008). Brissid echinoid Eupatagus L. Agassiz, 1847 from the Khuiala Formation, Jaisalmer district, Rajasthan India. Earth Sciences India, 1, 83–91.
Wagner, C. D., & Durham, J. W. (1966). Holectypoids. In R. C. Moore (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part U, Echinodermata 3(2) (pp. U440–U450). Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.
Zachos, L. G., & Molineux, A. (2003). Eocene echinoids of Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 77, 491–508.
Zachos, L. G., & Shaak, G. D. (1978). Stratigraphic significance of the Tertiary echinoid Eupatagus ingens Zachos. Journal of Paleontology, 52, 921–927.
S.K.D. thanks Tricia Andrew, E. Deslandes and Simon Mitchell for their help and companionship in the field. Constructive reviews by the two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.
About this article
Cite this article
van den Ende, C., Donovan, S.K. Urchins on the edge: an echinoid fauna with a mixed environmental signal from the Eocene of Jamaica. Swiss J Palaeontol 134, 129–142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-015-0072-3
- Yellow Limestone Group
- Guys Hill Formation