Ichnofamily Chirotheriidae Abel, 1935
Ichnogenus Chirotherium Kaup, 1835a
Type ichnospecies: Chirotherium barthii Kaup, 1835a
Chirotherium barthii Kaup, 1835a
2009 Isochirotherium sp.: Avanzini and Cavin, figs. 3, 4
2008 Isochirotherium, “Thecodont track”: Feldmann and Furrer, fig. 9
2012 Chirotherium cf. barthii: Cavin et al., figs. 2c–d, 4, 5f
Diagnosis
(emended after Peabody 1948; Haubold
1971a, b
) Medium-sized to large chirotheriids, showing low trackway width, an average pace angulation of 170°, and relatively low stride length values. Manus more strongly turned outward than the pes (average 25° and 9°, respectively). Pedal digit group I–IV relatively long and slender, with II–IV forming a symmetrical unit of which digit III is the longest. Digit I reduced, thinner than other digits and slightly posteriorly shifted. Proximal pads of digits I–IV form a posteriorly concave margin. Digit V with large circular basal pad positioned in line with digit IV, and with distinct, thin phalangeal portion that is strongly recurved. Manus with digit III longest, II and IV shorter and subequal to each other. Digits I and V short and occasionally absent. Digits IV and V laterally spread.
Material Isolated imprint from La Veudale N locality (Fig. 7a); trackway consisting of 3 consecutive pes imprints from Scex Blanc locality (Fig. 7b); trackway with 3 consecutive pes-manus sets and 1 pes from Vieux Emosson locality (Fig. 8a; Avanzini and Cavin 2009, fig. 3); partial trackway with 2 consecutive pes-manus sets from Cascade d’Emaney locality (Fig. 8b; Cavin et al. 2012, figs. 2d, 4, 5f); numerous isolated imprints from Obersand (Tödi, Glarus) locality (Figs. 9, 10). All specimens are left in the field.
Locality and horizon Vieux Emosson, Sex Blanc, La Veudale N and Cascade d’Emaney, Vieux Emossson Formation (Lower-Middle Triassic, Olenekian-Anisian); Obersand, Tödi (Glarus), Röti Dolomit (Middle Triassic, Anisian-Ladinian).
Description Tridactyl-pentadactyl pes and manus imprints. The pes shows a symmetrical digit group II–IV with digit III being longest. Digit I is shorter than digits II and IV and posteriorly shifted relative to digits II–IV. Digit V has a distinct circular to oval basal pad and a laterally spread or backward curved phalangeal portion that is separated from the former by a distinct constriction. If preserved, the manus is pentadactyl, rounded and relatively large; digit III is the longest; digit IV is relatively short. Trackways are narrow with a pace angulation reaching 142°–170° (Avanzini and Cavin 2009; Cavin et al. 2012). Pes with slight outward rotation (0°–16°), manus with stronger outward rotation (20°) relative to the midline than the pes. Two groups of pes size can be observed. The larger is about 20–25 cm, the smaller 14–17 cm in length (Table 3). Details such as impressions of phalangeal and metatarsophalangeal pads and claws are mostly indistinct due to the poor preservation.
A short trackway with three successive tridactyl to pentadactyl pes imprints (16 cm in length) from the Sex Blanc locality (Fig. 7b) lacks associated manus imprints due to the poor preservation, or alternatively, to complete overprinting by the pes. The pes imprints are symmetrical along digit III which is longest. Digit I is preserved with a short segment only in the first imprint of the trackway. Digit V is represented by a circular to oval pad posteromedially to the digit group II–IV. Digits vary in shape from elongate slender to short and broad rounded. Small triangular claw traces are visible in the first imprint of the trackway. Pes imprints are rotated outwards relative to the midline by 16° on average.
Pentadactyl chirotheriid pes imprints from the Obersand (Tödi, Glarus) locality (Figs. 9, 10) are about 15 and 25 cm in length and occasionally have an indistinctly preserved associated manus imprint. The pes imprints are slender, elongate and plantigrade to semiplantigrade. The preservation on a surface in dolomitic rock is poor, the digits being represented by elongated thin traces with accuminate distal ends and lacking distinct phalangeal pad impressions. Digit III appears to be the longest, digits II and IV are shorter and subequal in length, and digit I is shortest. Digit V consists of an oval basal pad that is occasionally elongated into a “heel” and a thinner, distal phalangeal portion that is largely everted or backward curved. A striking preservational feature is the presence of extensive v- or u-shaped interdigital hypeces.
Discussion Only a few tracks and trackways from the surfaces of the Vieux Emosson Formation and Röti Dolomite allow an ichnotaxonomic assignment more precise than “Chirotheriidae indet”. Cavin et al. (2012, figs. 2c–d, 4; Fig. 8b) described a trackway segment from the Cascade d’Emaney locality that they tentatively assigned to Chirotherium cf. barthii. The overall shape of the pes imprints with the symmetrical digit group II–IV, the relatively short digit I and the backward curved digit V match the morphology of typical Chirotherium barthii as described from the type locality in the Solling Formation (Middle Buntsandstein) of Hildburghausen, Germany (Soergel 1925; Haubold 1971a, b, 2006; Fig. 12a). A chirotheriid ichnotaxon similar to C. barthii in morphology is Isochirotherium soergeli (Haubold 1971a, fig. 20; Fig. 12j). However, the latter shows a smaller manus imprint relative to the pes imprint (1:6.5 vs. 1:3 in C. barthii; Haubold 1971a). In the specimen from Cascade d’Emaney, this ratio is 1:3 as in typical C. barthii. Also, in I. soergeli digit IV is subequal with digit I whereas in the Cascade d’Emaney specimen digit I is distinctly shorter than digit IV. Because of the strong morphological congruence with C. barthii, the latter is assigned here to Chirotherium barthii.
Avanzini and Cavin (2009, figs. 3, 4; Fig. 8a) describe a trackway from a loose block near the Vieux Emosson locality that they assign to Isochirotherium sp. This material is re-assigned here to Chirotherium barthii and differentiated from Isochirotherium based on the following features: (1) narrow trackway with orientation of pes imprints nearly parallel to the trackway midline, whereas in Isochirotherium, the pes imprints are strongly outward rotated, about 22° on average in Isochirotherium soergeli (Haubold 1971a); (2) relative large manus showing a manus: pes ratio of 1:3, whereas in I. soergeli this ratio is 1:6.5 (Haubold, 1971a). The “Isochirotherium-like” relatively short digit IV in the interpretive drawing of Avanzini and Cavin (2009) may reflect poor preservation.
The short trackway consisting of three successive pes imprints from the Scex Blanc locality (Fig. 7b) is assigned here to Chirotherium barthii based on the symmetrical digit group II–IV with digit III being longest, which is different from the proportions seen in C. sickleri (see below) where digit IV is distinctly longer than digit II.
The footprints from the surface at the Obersand (Tödi, Glarus) locality were described as “Thecodont” or “Chirotherium” tracks and compared with Isochirotherium by Feldmann and Furrer (2008). However, the symmetrical digit group II–IV, and the short, posteriorly shifted digit I suggest an assignment to Chirotherium barthii. Trackway interpretations by Feldmann and Furrer (2008) could not be confirmed when we re-investigated the tracksite in summer 2014. Obviously, interpretative trackway drawings of these authors are based on different parallel and overlapping trackways that were partly eroded, thus obscuring their true pattern. Some step length values given by Feldmann and Furrer (2008) are twice as large as those known from the global record of chirotheriids. This suggests that in their trackway map, some imprints are missing.
?Chirotherium sickleri Kaup 1835b
Diagnosis
(emended after Haubold
1971a, b), Trackway narrow with long strides, pace angulation 160°, pes with stronger outward rotation than the manus (average 21° and 10°, respectively). Digit IV in the pes slightly shorter than III but much longer than II. Digit I thin and short but with minor posterior shift compared with C. barthii. Digit V with slender recurved phalangeal portion and slightly enlarged basal pad. Manus with digit IV being proportionately longer than in C. barthii.
Material A pes manus couple from La Veudale N locality (Fig. 5c).
Locality and horizon Emosson, La Veudale N locality, Vieux Emosson Formation (Olenekian-Anisian).
Description Relatively slender pentadactyl pes imprint that has a length of 13.3 cm and a width of 9 cm (measured along the preserved trackfilling as a proxy of the true shape). Digit III appears to be longest, and digit V is strongly everted. A second imprint that is associated with, is more rounded in shape and has a length of 10.3 cm and a width of 9.3 cm (Table 3). The pes outward rotation is higher than the manus outward rotation relative to the (imaginary) trackway midline, the difference being about 25°.
Discussion The overall shape of the pes resembles that of the ichnogenus Chirotherium (compare Fig. 12a–g). If the specimen really is a related pes-manus couple, then the relative position of the pes and the stronger outward rotation compared with the manus suggests an assignment to the ichnospecies C. sickleri that is common, for example in the Buntsandstein of the Germanic Basin, co-occurring with C. barthii on the same surfaces.
Compared with C. sickleri, C. barthii shows a stronger outward rotation of the manus relative to the pes (average 25° and 9°, respectively), whereas in the former, the pes is more strongly outward rotated (average 10° and 21°, respectively) (Haubold 1971a). Even if absolute size of footprints is not relevant for their ichnotaxonomic assignment, the co-occurence of small-sized Chirotherium with large ones on the same surface points to a typical Buntsandstein assemblage with C. barthii and C. sickleri. Both ichnospecies could also be reflected in the different-sized Chirotherium footprints on the surfaces of the Obersand (Tödi, Glarus) locality (see above). However, this is mere speculation, and the poor preservation does not allow a concrete determination. Therefore, we consider this assignment questionable.
Ichnogenus Isochirotherium Haubold 1971
Isochirotherium herculis (Egerton 1838)
1982 Isochirotherium sp.: Demathieu and Weidmann, figs. 3b, 7b
2009 “possible Isochirotherium sp.”: Avanzini and Cavin, fig. 7a
2009 Isochirotherium sp.: Avanzini and Cavin, fig. 7b
Diagnosis
(after Haubold
1971a
) Largest known chirotheriids, pes length >30 cm; pace angulation 140°–160°; ratio stride : pes length = 4.5 : 1; larger outward rotation of manus traces relative to pes traces (average 41° and 30°, respectively); digit II ín the pes mostly as long as digit III, occasionally longer than digit III; digit divarication I–IV more than 50°; cross axis angle 80°; digit group I–IV wider than long and coalesced with digit V; manus mostly preserved with digits I–IV only.
Material Large pes imprint from La Veudale N locality (Fig. 11b). A large second specimen of similar overall shape, possibly of same assignment (Fig. 11a).
Locality and horizon Emosson, La Veudale N locality, Vieux Emosson Formation (Lower-Middle Triassic, Olenekian-Anisian).
Description Broad plantigrade pes imprints with wide short digits. Imprints show pes lengths of 26.4 and 22.0 cm and pes widths of 16.8 and 20.2 cm, respectively (Table 3). Digit V is posterolaterally positioned and represented by a massive oval basal pad. Digit proportions with digits II and III being longest and subequal in length or digit III being slightly longer. Digits I and IV are shorter and subequal in length. Digits II–V show broad rounded distal ends, whereas digit I shows a blunt claw trace.
Discussion Digit proportions of the Emosson tracks with the dominance of digits II and III and the shorter digits I and IV match the diagnostic features of Isochirotherium. From other chirotheriids, it is different by (1) the relatively longer digit I (Chirotherium, Brachychirotherium) and (2) the shorter digit IV (Protochirotherium, Synaptichnium). The broad sole surface and robust digits are similar to Isochirotherium herculis Egerton 1838. It is well known from the Middle Triassic of Great Britain and from the Germanic Basin. In particular, the Solling Formation (Middle Buntsandstein, Early Anisian) from Thuringia (Germany) has yielded well-preserved material (Haubold 1971a, b; Puff and Klein 2011; Fig. 12h). Therefore, we assign these footprints from the Vieux Emosson Formation to Isochirotherium herculis.
Chirotheriidae cf. Isochirotherium isp.
Material Partial trackway with two successive pes imprints (Fig. 11c).
Locality and horizon Vieux Emosson locality, Vieux Emosson Formation (Early-Middle Triassic, Olenekian-Anisian).
Description A single step with strongly outward rotated (estimated >20°) pes imprints showing a length of 24.1 cm and a width of 19.2 cm. The pace length is 64 cm (Table 3). The imprints show a compact anterior digit group with indistinctly preserved short digits of subequal lengths. Digit V is posterolaterally positioned and preserved with an oval basal pad that is strongly everted.
Discussion The poor preservation does not allow a concrete ichnotaxonomic assignment. Especially the digit proportions are indistinct. However, the strong outward rotation of the pes imprints is characteristic for Isochirotherium. The pes in the type ichnospecies Isochirotherium soergeli has an average outward rotation of 22° (Haubold 1971a). Strong outward rotation of pes imprints is also seen in Synaptichnium; however, even in poor preservation, the latter would exhibit a distinct ectaxonic shape, and the tracks from Vieux Emosson lack this feature. Therefore, we tentatively assign these footprints to cf. Isochirotherium isp.
Chirotheriidae indet.
1982 Paratrisauropus latus n. sp.: Demathieu and Weidmann, figs. 5, 8a, 9, 13A
1982 Brachychirotherium sp.: Demathieu and Weidmann, figs. 6a, 7a
1982 Paratrisauropus mirus n. sp.: Demathieu and Weidmann, figs. 6c, 7c
1982 Paratrisauropus bronneri n. sp.: Demathieu and Weidmann, fig. 7d, 8b
1982 Prototrisauropus sp.: Demathieu and Weidmann, fig. 11
1982 Deuterosauropodopus sedunensis n. sp.: Demathieu and Weidmann, figs. 13B, 14A
1982 Pachysaurichnium emossonense n. g. n. sp.: Demathieu and Weidmann, figs. 13C, 14B
1982 Bifidichnium ambiguum n. gen. n. sp.: Demathieu and Weidmann, figs. 13D, 14C
2009 Paratrisauropus latus: Avanzini and Cavin, fig. 5a
2009 Paratrisauropus bronneri: Avanzini and Cavin, fig. 5b
2009 Paratrisauropus mirus: Avanzini and Cavin, fig. 5c
2009 Deuterosauropus sedunensis (“chirotheroid track”): Avanzini and Cavin, fig. 6
2012 “Deuterosauropodopus”, “Prototrisauropus” “Pachysaurichnium”, “Paratrisauropus”
(“chirotheriid footprints”): Cavin et al., fig. 5a–e
Material More than 1500 pes and manus imprints of oval to circular shape (Figs. 5a–b, d–f, 6)
Locality and horizon La Veudale N, Vieux Emosson, Col de Corbeaux 1 and 2, Vieux Emosson Formation. Le Châtelet (Lower-Middle Triassic, Olenekian-Anisian).
Description Imprints (up to 39 cm in length) that mostly lack distinct digit impressions (Table 3). They show concentric sediment rims, slightly resembling the tracks of sauropodomorphs from the Jurassic-Cretaceous. Two morphotypes can be distinguished:
Morphotype A. Elongate-oval pes imprints and associated circular manus imprints in a distance of some centimetres anterior to the former (Fig. 5a).
Morphotype B. Hourglass-like shaped imprints (Fig. 5b, d–f).
Discussion Whereas Morphotype A clearly represents pes-manus couples, this seems to be not distinct for Morphotype B. Here, the smaller circular impression may represent the posteriorly overstepped manus or, alternatively in some cases, the impression of pedal digit V/”heel”.