Skip to main content

Volume 137 Supplement 2

Special Issue: Hans Hess: A lifelong passion for fossil echinoderms

A fossil crinoid with four arms, Mississippian (Lower Carboniferous) of Clitheroe, Lancashire, UK

Abstract

One of the characteristic features used to define the echinoderms is five-fold symmetry. The monobathrid camerate crinoid genus Amphoracrinus Austin normally has five arms, but an aberrant specimen from Salthill Quarry, Clitheroe, Lancashire (Mississippian, lower Chadian), has only four. The radial plate in the B-ray supports only interbrachial and/or tegminal plates; there never has been an arm in this position. The reason why this arm failed to grow is speculative, but there is no evidence for the common drivers of aberrant growth in crinoids such as borings; rather, a genetic or developmental flaw, or infestation by an unidentified parasite, must be suspected. In the absence of the B-ray arm, the other arms of Amphoracrinus sp. have arrayed themselves at 90° to each other to make the most efficient feeding structure possible.

Introduction

The echinoderms are commonly recognized on the presence of three features: a stereom calcite microstructure to the test and associated mutable collagenous tissues; a water vascular system and associated structures, particularly tube feet; and a prevalent fivefold (pentameral) symmetry (Donovan 1999; but see Jefferies 1988). Of these criteria, it is the fivefold symmetry that is most commonly modified, as illustrated by, for example (and amongst many other examples), the bilateral symmetry of irregular echinoids that modifies the ancestral pentameral arrangement. In this example, a feature of echinoid evolution is impressed on the members of an entire clade. Much more rarely and unexpectedly, the normal five-fold symmetry of some taxa may be modified in some individuals as deformities, such as showing four- or six-fold symmetry, or asymmetries, in, for example, echinoids (Kier 1967, pp. 39–40, fig. 22, pl. 12; Donovan and Lewis 2009), blastoids (Beaver 1967, pp. S342–S344; Macurda 1980; Bohatý et al. 2010) and crinoids (Rozhnov and Mirantsev 2014).

Herein, we describe and interpret a peculiar crinoid theca, collected by A.T. from Salthill Quarry, Clitheroe. The specimen is a monobathrid camerate, Amphoracrinus sp., which has the normal fivefold symmetry in the radial plates of the cup, but developed only four arms. Such an abnormality is rare and poses questions that can only be explained by generalities, yet it shows features that claim illustration and comment.

Locality and horizon

The Clitheroe area of Lancashire, NW England (Donovan and Tenny 2015, fig. 1), is one of the most important areas for Upper Palaeozoic fossil echinoderms, particularly crinoids, in the British Isles (see, amongst others, Donovan 1992; Donovan et al. 2003; Donovan and Lewis 2011). Salthill Quarry SSSI is a disused quarry now given over to industrial units and a geological trail. The specimen described herein came from locality 4 of Kabrna (2011; = Grayson 1981, point 3; Bowden et al. 1997, locality 6; Ausich and Kammer 2006, locality (4SH + 5SH); NGR [SD 755 425]). This scraped area is well known to collectors. It is within the outcrop of the Salthill Cap Beds of Miller and Grayson (1972); Dinantian (Mississippian, Lower Carboniferous), Tournaisian, lower Chadian (George et al. 1976, table 2; N. J. Riley in Donovan and Sevastopulo 1985, p. 179; Ausich and Kammer 2006).

Description

The specimen is registered in the collection of the Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden (RGM.1332253). Theca small, globular, unsculptured and with a low-domed tegmen (Fig. 1c) composed of thick plates. Stem not preserved; stem facet moderately broad, rounded with a small, central lumen (Fig. 1b). Basals three, forming a low circlet; sutures between basals in CD interray, and B and E rays (Fig. 2). Radials five, hexagonal, wider than high, but much higher than basal circlet; B radial narrow, not supporting an arm. A, C, D, and E radials each support an arm. Two fixed primibrachials per arm: IBr1 as broad as a radial, but lower; IBr2 axillary, also broad and low; all arms incomplete at IIBr1 or lower. The B radial supports a suite of polygonal interbrachial or tegminal plates.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Monobathrid camerate crinoid Amphoracrinus sp., RGM.1332253 with only four arms. Key: A–E = Carpenter rays; AT = anal tube. a Apical view, anal tube (incomplete) in CD interray (= posterior); B ray to mid-right. b Basal view, posterior towards bottom of page; B ray to mid-left. Articular facet of column central. c Posterior view; CD interray centre. Specimen uncoated. Scale bar represents 10 mm

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic diagram of the cup plating of the monobathrid camerate crinoid Amphoracrinus sp., RGM.1332253. Basals three and low; radials five and with the primanal (X) in the circlet in the CD interray. There is no arm developed in the B ray. Key: A–E = Carpenter rays

Radial circlet interrupted by a narrower, polygonal (hexagonal?) primanal. Primanal succeeded by a row of four plates; central pair of anal plates supported by primanal and shoulders of radials; more lateral plates abut arms and are supported by IBr1 (C ray) or the D radial and IBr1. At least three further rows of polygonal plates occur between this level and the anal tube (Fig. 1a). The tegmen is poorly preserved, but multi-plated.

Discussion

Two genera of monobathrid camerate crinoids from the Mississippian of the Clitheroe area broadly agree with the gross morphology of this specimen, Actinocrinites J.S. Miller and Amphoracrinus Austin. RGM.1332253 is an Amphoracrinus, because it “Differs from Actinocrinites in having the anal tube positioned sub-apically and orientated posteriorly” (Donovan and Lewis 2011, p. 59). Donovan (1992, table 2; Donovan and Lewis 2011, p. 59) listed five nominal species of Amphoracrinus from Salthill Quarry: Amphoracrinus gilbertsoni (Phillips); Amphoracrinus atlas (M’Coy); Amphoracrinus bollandensis Wright; Amphoracrinus turgidus Wright; and Amphoracrinus compressus Wright. RGM.1332253 is not close to any of these species which commonly have a more inflated tegmen (Wright 1955). This contrast may be, in part, a further growth deformity; the specimen may be an immature individual; or a combination of these factors. It is, therefore, referred to Amphoracrinus sp. herein. The normal geometry of this crinoid theca is, needless to say, to have five equally well-developed arms.

Why is the B-ray arm of this specimen missing? It is certainly not due to predation; there never has been an arm in this position (Figs. 1, 2). Deformed crinoids from Salthill Quarry typically have a prominent small round hole(s) produced by an invasive invertebrate(s) (for example, Donovan 1991, figs. 1, 2) and/or are swollen (such as Donovan et al. 2014, fig. 4G; for a review, see Jangoux 1987). Symmetry-altering changes without an obvious causative mechanism are rare, but not unknown. For example, Donovan (1986, fig. 1A) illustrated a crinoid columnal with a tetralobate lumen that is now suspected to be a growth deformity, in the absence of any other similar columnals having been found subsequently from this site or, indeed, the Mississippian, although that specimen is most regular. RGM.1332253 is thought to have ‘lost’ its B-ray arm either due to a genetic defect or to a parasitic(?) infestation that left no other evidence of invasion, similar to the gall formers of decapod crustaceans (Klompmaker et al. 2014).

Apart from the lack of one arm, the most noticeable feature of this specimen is the attitude of the remaining arms to each other. In a typical crinoid, five arms would be oriented at 72° to each other (Nichols 1967; Stephenson 1974, 1978). If one arm of a five-armed crinoid was removed by, for example, a predator, then four of the remainder would be at 72° to each other and the vacated space would be 144°. In contrast, in RGM.1332253, which has never had such a pentameral arrangement, the arms are arrayed more or less opposite each other, that is, the angles between them are about 90°. That is, never ever having had a fifth arm, the rays have adjusted to produce the most symmetrical array of feeding structures (= arms) possible. Although not preserved, the branching of the free arms and the distribution of their tube feet would have further adapted to make the most efficient feeding array possible for such a tetragonal arrangement.

References

  • Ausich, W. I., & Kammer, T. W. (2006). Stratigraphical and geographical distribution of Mississippian (Lower Carboniferous) Crinoidea from England and Wales. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 56, 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, H. H. (1967). Morphology. In R. C. Moore (Ed.), Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, part S, Echinodermata 1 (Vol. 2, pp. S300–S350). Boulder and Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohatý, J., Nardin, E., & Hein, U. (2010). Extraordinary abnormalities in Middle Devonian blastoids from the Rhenish Massif. Zitteliana, B29, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, A., Webster, M., & Mitcham, T. (1997). Salthill Quarry geology trail. Geologists’ Association Guide, 58, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K. (1986). An unusual crinoid columnal from Salthill Quarry, Clitheroe, Lancashire. Geological Journal, 21, 421–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K. (1991). Site selectivity of a Lower Carboniferous boring organism infesting a crinoid. Geological Journal, 26, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K. (1992). A field guide to the fossil echinoderms of Coplow, Bellman and Salthill Quarries, Clitheroe, Lancashire. North West Geologist, 2, 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K. (1999). Echinoderms and calcichordates. In E. Savazzi (Ed.), The functional morphology of the invertebrate skeleton (pp. 565–600). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K., Kabrna, P., & Donovan, P. H. (2014). Salthill Quarry: a resource being revitalized. Deposits, 40, 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K., & Lewis, D. N. (2009). Paleontological implications of multiple genital pores in the apical system of Eucidaris tribuloides (Lamarck), Recent of Jamaica. Caribbean Journal of Science, 45, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K., & Lewis, D. N. (2011). Fossil echinoderms from the Mississippian (Lower Carboniferous) of the Clitheroe district. In P. N. Kabrna (Ed.), Carboniferous geology: Bowland Fells to Pendle Hill (pp. 55–96). Barnoldswick: Craven and Pendle Geological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K., Lewis, D. N., & Crabb, P. (2003). Lower Carboniferous echinoderms of northwest England. Palaeontological Association Fold-Out Fossils, 1, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K., & Sevastopulo, G. D. (1985). Crinoid arms from Salthill Quarry, Clitheroe, Lancashire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 45, 179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, S. K., & Tenny, A. (2015). A peculiar bored crinoid from Salthill Quarry, Clitheroe, Lancashire (Mississippian; Tournaisian), UK. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 60, 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, T. N., Johnson, G. A. L., Mitchell, M., Prentice, J. E., Ramsbottom, W. H. C., Sevastopulo, G. D., & Wilson, R. B. (1976). A correlation of Dinantian rocks in the British Isles. Geological Society Special Report, 7, 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, R. (1981). Salthill Quarry geology trail. London: Nature Conservancy Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jangoux, M. (1987). Diseases of Echinodermata. IV. Structural abnormalities and general considerations on biotic diseases. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 3, 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, R. P. S. (1988). How to characterize the echinodermata—some implications of the sister-group relationship between echinoderms and chordates. In C. R. C. Paul & A. B. Smith (Eds.), Echinoderm phylogeny and evolutionary biology (pp. 3–12). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabrna, P. (2011). Excursion 5. Pendle Hill and Clitheroe. In P. Kabrna (Ed.), Carboniferous geology: Bowland Fells to Pendle Hill (pp. 157–165). UK: Craven and Pendle Geological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kier, P. M. (1967). Revision of the oligopygoid echinoids. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 152(2), 1–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klompmaker, A. A., Artal, P., van Bakel, B. W. M., Fraaije, R. H. B., & Jagt, J. W. M. (2014). Parasites in the fossil record: a Cretaceous fauna with isopod-infested decapod crustaceans, infestation patterns through time, and a new ichnotaxon. PLoS One, 9(3), e92551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macurda, D. B., Jr. (1980). Abnormalities of the Carboniferous blastoids Pentremites. Journal of Paleontology, 54, 1155–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., & Grayson, R. F. (1972). Origin and structures of the Visean “reef” limestones near Clitheroe, Lancashire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 38, 607–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, D. (1967). Pentamerism and the calcite skeleton in echinoderms. Nature, 215, 665–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozhnov, S. V., & Mirantsev, G. V. (2014). Structural aberrations in the cup in cladid crinoids from the Carboniferous of the Moscow Region. Paleontological Journal, 48, 1243–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, D. G. (1974). Pentamerism and the ancestral echinoderm. Nature, 250, 82–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, D. G. (1978). On the origin of the five-fold pattern of echinoderms. Thalassia Jugoslavica, 12(for 1976), 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. (1955). A monograph of the British Carboniferous Crinoidea. Part I (Vol. II, 108, no. 467, pp. 191–254). London: Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Constructive reviews by Dr. Imran Rahman (Oxford University Museum of Natural History) and a second, anonymous referee are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen K. Donovan.

Additional information

Editorial Handling: C.Klug.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tenny, A., Donovan, S.K. A fossil crinoid with four arms, Mississippian (Lower Carboniferous) of Clitheroe, Lancashire, UK. Swiss J Palaeontol 137, 255–258 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-018-0163-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-018-0163-z

Keywords

  • Salthill Quarry
  • Chadian
  • Amphoracrinus
  • Symmetry