Aigner, T. (1985). Storm depositional systems. Dynamic stratigraphy in modern and ancient shallow-marine sequences. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences,
3, 174.
Aigner, T., & Bachmann, G. H. (1992). Sequence-stratigraphic framework of the German Triassic. Sedimentary Geology,
80, 115–135.
Article
Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., & Gahn, F. (2004). Testing predator-driven evolution with paleozoic crinoid arm regeneration. Science,
305, 1453–1454.
Article
Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., Mooi, R., & Messing, C. G. (1999). Predator–prey interactions between cidaroids and crinoids and their ecological and evolutionary implications. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs,
31, 172–173.
Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., Salamon, M. A., Gorzelak, P., Mooi, R., Messing, G. G., & Gahn, F. J. (2010). Post-Paleozoic crinoid radiation in response to benthic predation preceded the Mesozoic marine revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
107, 5893–5896.
Article
Google Scholar
Beckers, J., Wurst, W., & Hrabé de Angelis, M. (2009). Towards better mouse models: Enhanced genotypes, systemic phenotyping and envirotype modeling. Nature Review Genetics,
10, 371–380.
Article
Google Scholar
Berrigan, D., & Scheiner, S. M. (2004). Modeling the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. In T. J. DeWitt & S. M. Scheiner (Eds.), Phenotypic plasticity, functional and conceptual approaches (pp. 82–97). New York: Oxford University Press.
Beyrich, H. E. (1858). Über die Crinoiden des Muschelkalkes. Abhandlungen der königlichen preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin,
1858, 1–49.
Google Scholar
Bielert, U., & Bielert, F. (2000). Gemeinsames Auftreten von zwei Arten der Gattung Encrinus im Unteren Muschelkalk am Nordrand des Thüringer Beckens. Beiträge zur Geologie von Thüringen,
7, 137–145.
Google Scholar
Chauffe, K. M., & Nichols, P. A. (1995). Differentiating evolution from environmentally induced modifications in Mid-Carboniferous conodonts. Palaeontology,
38, 875–895.
Google Scholar
David, J., & Roux, M. (2000). Convergence phénotypique chez les pentacrines Endoxocrinus et Diplocrinus liée aux contraintes environnementales. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences Serie III—Sciences de la Vie,
323, 281–286.
Google Scholar
DeWitt, T. J., & Scheiner, S. M. (2004). Phenotypic plasticity, functional and conceptual approaches. In T. J. DeWitt & S. M. Scheiner (Eds.), (pp. 274). New York: Oxford University Press.
Feist-Burkhardt, S., Götz, A. E., Szulc, J., Borkhataria, R., Geluk, M., Haas, J., Hornung, J., Jordan, P., Kempf, O., Michalík, J., Nawrocki, J., Reinhardt, L., Ricken, W., Röhling, H.-G., Rüffer, T., Török, Á., & Zühlke, R. (2008). Triassic. In T. McCann (Ed.), The Geology of Central Europe Volume 2: Mesozoic and Cenozoic (pp. 749–822). London: The Geological Society.
Gahn, F. J., & Kammer, T. W. (2002). The cladid crinoid Barycrinus from the Burlington Limestone (Early Osagean) and the phylogenetics of Mississippian Botryocrinids. Journal of Paleontology,
76, 123–133.
Article
Google Scholar
Hagdorn, H. (1978). Muschel/Krinoiden-Bioherme im Oberen Muschelkalk (mo1, Anis) von Crailsheim und Schwäbisch Hall (SW-Deutschland). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Abhandlungen,
156, 31–86.
Google Scholar
Hagdorn, H. (1986). Neue Funde von Encrinus greppini DeLoriol 1877 aus dem Oberen Muschelkalk von Südbaden und der Nordschweiz. Paläontologische Zeitschrift,
60, 285–297.
Google Scholar
Hagdorn, H. (1991). The Muschelkalk in Germany—An introduction. In H. Hagdorn (Ed.), Muschelkalk—a field guide (pp. 7–21). Korb: Goldschneck-Verlag.
Hagdorn, H. (1999). Triassic Muschelkalk of Central Europe. In H. Hess, et al. (Eds.), Fossil crinoids (pp. 164–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hagdorn, H. (2004). Muschelkalkmuseum Ingelfingen (pp. 88). Hagdorn, H. (Ed.), Heilbronn: Edition Lattner.
Hagdorn, H., & Nitsch, E. (2009). 6th International Triassic Field Workshop—field guide.
Hagdorn, H., & Ockert, W. (1993). Encrinus liliiformis im Trochitenkalk Süddeutschlands. In H. Hagdorn & A. Seilacher (Eds.), Muschelkalk. Schöntaler Symposium 1991 (pp. 245–260). Korb: Goldschneck Verlag.
Hagdorn, H., & Simon, T. (2005). Der Muschelkalk in der Stratigraphischen Tabelle von Deutschland 2002. Newsletters on Stratigraphy,
41, 143–158.
Article
Google Scholar
Harper, E. M. (2006). Dissecting post-Palaeozoic arms races. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,
232, 322–343.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnson, A. L. A. (1981). Detection of ecophenotypic variation in fossils and its application to a Jurassic scallop. Lethaia,
14, 277–285.
Article
Google Scholar
Linck, O. (1954). Die Muschelkalk-Seelilie Encrinus liliiformis—Ergebnisse einer Grabung. Naturwissenschaftliche Monatsschrift, Aus der Heimat,
62, 225–235.
Google Scholar
Linck, O. (1965). Stratigraphische, stratinomische und ökologische Betrachtungen zu Encrinus liliiformis Lamarck. Jahreshefte des geologischen Landesamtes in Baden-Württemberg,
7, 123–148.
Google Scholar
Macurda, D. B., & Meyer, D. L. (1974). Feeding posture of modern stalked crinoids. Nature,
247, 394–396.
Article
Google Scholar
Messing, C. G. (1994). Comatulid crinoids (Echinodermata) of Madang, Papua New Guinea, and environs: Diversity and ecology. In B. David, et al. (Eds.), Echinoderms through time (pp. 237–243). Rotterdam: Balkema.
Messing, C. G., Baumiller, T. K., & David, J. (1999). Morphological differentiation in the living isocrinid Endoxocrinus (Echinodermata: Crinoidea): A response to differences in habitat? Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs,
31, 171.
Google Scholar
Messing, C. G., & Llewellyn, G. (1991). Variations in posture, morphology and distribution relative to current flow and topography in an assemblage of living stalked crinoids. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs,
23, 343–344.
Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., & Macurda, D. B. (1977). Adaptive radiation of the comatulid crinoids. Paleobiology,
3, 74–82.
Google Scholar
Oji, T. (1996). Is predation intensity reduced with increasing depth? Evidence from the west Atlantic stalked crinoid Endoxocrinus parrae (Gervais) and implications for the Mesozoic marine evolution. Paleobiology,
22, 339–351.
Google Scholar
Oji, T., & Okamoto, T. (1994). Arm autotomy and arm branching pattern as anti-predatory adaptations in stalked and stalkless crinoids. Paleobiology,
20, 27–39.
Google Scholar
Quenstedt, F. A. (1876). Petrefactenkunde Deutschlands—Die Asteriden und Encriniden nebst Cysti- und Blastoideen, Abtheilung 1, Band. 4. Leipzig, 1874–1876, pp. 742.
Roux, M. (1987). Evolutionary ecology and biogeography of recent stalked crinoids as a model for the fossil record. In M. Jangoux & J. M. Lawrence (Eds.), Echinoderm studies 2 (pp. 1–53). Rotterdam: Balkema.
Schoch, R., & Wild, R. (1999). Die Wirbeltiere des Muschelkalks unter besonderer Berücksichtigung Süddeutschlands. In N. Hauschke & V. Wilde (Eds.), Trias, Eine ganz andere Welt: Mitteleuropa im frühen Erdmittelalter (pp. 331–342). München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.
Signor, P. W., & Brett, C. E. (1984). The mid-Paleozoic precursor to the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology,
10, 229–245.
Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. (2008). Predation defeats competition on the seafloor. Paleobiology,
34, 1–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. (1977). The Mesozoic marine revolution: Evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology,
3, 245–258.
Google Scholar
Vollrath, A. (1957). Zur Entwicklung des Trochitenkalks zwischen Rheintal und Hohenloher Ebene. Jahreshefte des Geologischen Landesamtes Baden-Württemberg,
2, 119–134.
Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution (pp. 794). West-Eberhard, M. J. (Ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.